top of page
Raising the global standard for online reviews
No wagering requirements rewards
PlayOJO
72
Trust Review
80
- Licensing/audit disclosures; versioned T&Cs
Strong licensing/audit disclosures, but operator enforcement history is a material compliance risk.
PlayOJO discloses UKGC-regulated operations and an MGA licence number, and states iTech Labs audits RNG/software. UKGC enforcement findings against the operator for AML and safer-gambling weaknesses materially reduce confidence. Several operational details (withdrawal commitments, full payment methods, RG tool inventory) were not evidenced in the cited official sources and are treated as neutral unless required disclosures.
Licensing & Regulatory Overview
Primary Licences:
UKGC (via Skill On Net); MGA (MGA/CRP/171/2009/01); AGCO/iGO (Ontario terms)
Regulatory Strength:
High (UKGC); High (MGA/AGCO)
Licence Validity:
Licence numbers disclosed; validity not independently confirmed here
Enforcement History:
UKGC settlement against operator Skill On Net for AML/SR failings (2021–2022)
Safety & Fairness Summary
KYC / EDD:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Harm Monitoring:
Operator had SR monitoring weaknesses per UKGC findings
Intervention Quality
Operator interactions found insufficient per UKGC findings
Responsible Gambling Tools:
- No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Self‑Exclusion:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Fairness & RNG
RNG Certification:
iTech Labs audit claimed
RTP Disclosure:
Audit includes RTP checks; per-game RTP disclosure not evidenced
Game Integrity:
Third-party testing described; details not evidenced
Game Integrity:
Terms Clarity:
Operational Transparency:
Versioned T&Cs published (updated 03/12/2024)
Operator and licence disclosed in T&Cs
Payments & Financial Safeguards
Withdrawal Speed:
Payment Partners:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Financial Safeguards:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
AML Controls:
UKGC found AML control deficiencies at operator level
Security & Data Protection
Security Standards:
SSL encryption stated
Privacy Practices:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Data Handling:
Ontario geolocation control described
Breach History:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Complaints & Dispute Resolution
Complaint Volume:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Complaint Themes:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
ADR Outcomes:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
Unresolved Disputes:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
🚩 Red Flags
Operator AML failings; Operator SR failings; Limited verified withdrawal/cashier detail; Limited verified RG tool set; Multi-jurisdiction complexity
Responsible Gambling Compliance
RG Monitoring:
RG Interactions:
Operator SR weaknesses per UKGC findings
Operator interactions not consistently effective per UKGC findings
Limit Tools:
No Evidence Available (Neutral)
RG Compliance:
Operator interactions not consistently effective per UKGC findings
bottom of page